House v. Batson
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Duckworth, Justice.
The pleadings and the evidence make the one issue whether or not the.year’s-support property involved was encumbered for the support of the wife, beneficiary thereunder. On this question the evidence on the trial was in sharp conflict, and the discretion of-the judge in denying an injunction will not be disturbed. Code, § 55-108; Gillen v. Coconut Grove Bank & Trust Co., 171 Ga. 162 ( 154 S. E. 787 ); Murrell v. North London Fine Art Co., 173 Ga. 224 ( 160 S. E. 343 ); Traylor v. Peoples Bank of Carrollton, 179 Ga. 895 (3) ( 177 S. E. 702 ). No issue made by the pleadings and the evidence' requires application or construction'of the act approved March. 12, 1937 (Ga. L. 1937, p. 861),-since it appears that none of'the. beneficiaries of the year’s stípport were minors at the time the loan, was-made, and the minor beneficiaries who have attained the age of majority are not parties seeking relief in the instant case. .
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.