Smith v. Smith
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Head, Justice.
There being in the present case no question which can properly be adjudicated without reference to the evidence, and there being no evidence in either the bill of exceptions or the transcript of the record, it will be assumed that the judgment of the court below is correct. Ingram v. Clarke, 96 Ga. 777 ( 22 S. E. 334 ); Roberts v. City of Cairo, 133 Ga. 642, 648 ( 66 S. E. 938 ); Henriot v. Henriot, 183 Ga. 510 ( 188 S. E. 684 ); Eller v. Roan & Lamb, 193 Ga. 877 ( 20 S. E. 2d 253 ); McCaskill v. Parker, 204 Ga. 398 ( 50 S. E. 2d 14 ); Attaway v. Duncan, 206 Ga. 230 ( 56 S. E. 2d 269 ); Giles v. Peachtree Pantries, 209 Ga. 536 ( 74 S. E. 2d 545 ); Rowell v. Rowell, 211 Ga. 127, 130 ( 84 S. E. 2d 23 ).
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.