TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Sankey v. United States

Madeline Sankey, Marcel Sankey, Marcel Sankey, Trustee for Chase Sankey, a Minor, Celeste Medicine Bird, Trustee for Jessie Ada Sankey, Overton Sankey, and Madeline Dawn Sankey, Minors, Vinita Sankey, Byron Sankey, George F. Sutton, Thelma Haag, Olga Haag, Willie Meeks, Wesley Meeks, Billy Tiger, Barbara Pennock, Patty Harjo, Robert Pennock, Laura Lasley, William Pennock, Richard Pennock, Ricki Sitting Bull, Frederick Sitting Bull, Ruth Sitting Bull Orange, Ethelyn B. Little Thunder, Individually, and on Behalf of All Other Cheyenne and Arapahoe Allottees Similarly Situated v. The United States

Sankey v. United States, 951 F.2d 1266 (Fed. Cir. 1991)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
December 11, 1991
Docket
No. 91-5105
Citations
951 F.2d 12661991 WL 2608691991 U.S. App. LEXIS 32584
Status
Unpublished

Opinion

951 F.2d 1266

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Madeline SANKEY, Marcel Sankey, Marcel Sankey, trustee for Chase Sankey, a minor, Celeste Medicine Bird, trustee for Jessie Ada Sankey, Overton Sankey, and Madeline Dawn Sankey, minors, Vinita Sankey, Byron Sankey, George F. Sutton, Thelma Haag, Olga Haag, Willie Meeks, Wesley Meeks, Billy Tiger, Barbara Pennock, Patty Harjo, Robert Pennock, Laura Lasley, William Pennock, Richard Pennock, Ricki Sitting Bull, Frederick Sitting Bull, Ruth Sitting Bull Orange, Ethelyn B. Little Thunder, individually, and on behalf of all other Cheyenne and Arapahoe Allottees similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 91-5105.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Dec. 11, 1991.

On Appeal from the United States Claims Court, in Case No(s). 90-93 L.

22 Cl.Ct. 743.

AFFIRMED.

MICHEL, LOURIE and CLEVENGER, Circuit Judges.

Judgment

PER CURIAM 1

AFFIRMED. Fed.Cir.R. 36.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1996: 12000: 119962026peak 1996 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Navajo Nation v. United States46 Fed. Cl. 217 (Fed. Cl. 2000)
  2. Colon v. United States35 Fed. Cl. 515 (Fed. Cl. 1996)

Most recent

  1. Navajo Nation v. United States46 Fed. Cl. 217 (Fed. Cl. 2000)
  2. Colon v. United States35 Fed. Cl. 515 (Fed. Cl. 1996)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Oloroso (Francisco C.) v. Office of Pers. Mgmt., 951 F.2d 1266 (Fed. Cir. 1991) 23

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list