TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Gude v. State

Gude v. State, 194 S.E.2d 445 (Ga. 1972)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Georgia · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 4, 1972
Docket
No. 27545
Judges
Mobley
Citations
194 S.E.2d 445229 Ga. 8311972 Ga. LEXIS 794

Opinion of the Court — Mobley

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Mobley, Chief Justice.

Frederick Gude pleaded guilty on May 13, 1969, in the Superior Court of Fulton County to the offense of murder and received a life sentence. On June 21, 1972, he transmitted by mail to the Superior Court of Fulton County a pro se motion seeking to be allowed to perfect an appeal out of time, and praying that the court appoint counsel. On August 1, 1972, the trial court passed an order denying the relief prayed for in the motion. The order recited in part that: "This court has this date considered said pleading together with the original transcript at the hearing on entry of the guilty plea on May 13, 1969, and the fact that the matter proceeded to trial and six witnesses testified for the State prior to the entry of the plea of guilty, and finds from the same that the guilty plea of Frederick Gude was freely, understandingly, and voluntarily made without undue influence or promise of leniency, with full understanding of constitutional right, and with the assistance of and in the presence of his own counsel.” The trial judge ordered that a copy of that order be sent to defend *832 ant at his last known address, "the same being the Georgia State Penitentiary at Reidsville, Georgia.” The appeal is from this order.

Argued November 14, 1972 Decided December 4, 1972. Frederick L. Gude, pro se. Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Morris H. Rosenberg, for appellee.

The trial court construed the motion of the appellant as being one to withdraw his guilty plea. The record sustains the finding that the plea of guilty was intelligently and voluntarily made.

An examination of the motion reveals that some of the grounds are such as might appropriately be urged in a petition for writ of habeas corpus. However, the venue to entertain a writ of habeas corpus is in the superior court of the circuit where the alleged illegal detention exists. Code § 50-103. The record shows that the appellant is detained in Tattnall County, and not in Fulton County, and for this reason the motion could not be treated as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus by the Superior Court of Fulton County. Merneigh v. State, 223 Ga. 310 ( 154 SE2d 439 ).

The trial court did not err in entering the order appealed from by the appellant.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1975: 12021: 119752026peak 1975 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Schoicket v. State865 S.E.2d 170 (Ga. 2021)
  2. Chandler v. Ault216 S.E.2d 101 (Ga. 1975)

Most recent

  1. Schoicket v. State865 S.E.2d 170 (Ga. 2021)
  2. Chandler v. Ault216 S.E.2d 101 (Ga. 1975)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Merneigh v. State, 154 S.E.2d 439 (Ga. 1967) 1

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list