TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Fisher v. Pearson

Fisher v. Pearson, 57 S.E. 1018 (Ga. Ct. App. 1907)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Georgia · State Appellate Courts
Decided
March 28, 1907
Docket
No. 215
Judges
Powell
Citations
57 S.E. 10181 Ga. App. 5171907 Ga. App. LEXIS 21
Summary
Appeal, from Irwin superior court — Judge Martin. December 26, 1906.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Powell

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Powell, J.

1. A writ of error lies to a judgment in a superior court refusing a motion to reinstate a dismissed appeal case. Van Dyke v. Van Dyke, 120 Ga. 984 ; Aiken v. Peck, 72 Ga. 434 .

2. When, in case of attachment served by process of garnishment, judgment has been entered against the defendant in attachment, and also against the garnishee, for the full amount sued for, and the defendant appeals, with the garnishee as sole surety on his appeal bond, such bond is a nullity, and the appeal is properly dismissed. McMurria v. Powell, 120 Ga. 766 ; Napier v. Woodall, 118 Ga. 830 (2) ; Harvely v. *518 Daley, 112 Ga. 822 ; Benson v. Shines, 107 Ga. 406 ; Gordon v. Robertson, 26 Ga. 410 ; Eufaula Home Ins. Co. v. Plant, 36 Ga. 623 ; Osborne v. Hughes, 93 Ga. 445 . Judgment affirmed.

Appeal, from Irwin superior court — Judge Martin. December 26, 1906. Submitted March 25, Decided March 28, 1907. E. W. Byman, for plaintiff in error. Haygood & Quits, contra.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1907: 11910: 11939: 11942: 119072026peak 1907 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Samples v. Samples21 S.E.2d 601 (Ga. 1942)
  2. Maddox v. Waldrop4 S.E.2d 684 (Ga. Ct. App. 1939)
  3. Hines v. International Harvester Co.66 S.E. 989 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910)
  4. Paschal & Son v. Moline Jewelry Co.58 S.E. 488 (Ga. Ct. App. 1907)

Most recent

  1. Samples v. Samples21 S.E.2d 601 (Ga. 1942)
  2. Maddox v. Waldrop4 S.E.2d 684 (Ga. Ct. App. 1939)
  3. Hines v. International Harvester Co.66 S.E. 989 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910)
  4. Paschal & Son v. Moline Jewelry Co.58 S.E. 488 (Ga. Ct. App. 1907)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 9

DepthCaseCited by
Van Dyke v. Van Dyke, 48 S.E. 380 (Ga. 1904) 33
Benson v. Shines, 33 S.E. 439 (Ga. 1899) 18
Aiken v. Peck & Allen, 72 Ga. 434 (1884) 12
Gordon v. Robertson, 26 Ga. 410 (1858) 11
Harvely v. Daly & Co., 38 S.E. 41 (Ga. 1901) 8
McMurria v. Powell Bros. & Chason, 48 S.E. 354 (Ga. 1904) 8
Napier Bros. v. Woodall, 45 S.E. 684 (Ga. 1903) 7
Eufaula Home Ins. v. Plant & Cubbedge, 36 Ga. 623 (1867) 6
Osborne v. Hughes, 21 S.E. 65 (Ga. 1894) 5

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list