Vance v. State
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Hill, C. J.
This court having duly certified to the Supreme Court the-constitutional questions made in the bill of exceptions, and that court, having decided that the act of 1903 (Acts, pp. 90, 91), under which, plaintiff in error was convicted, was not contrary to the provisions, of the constitution on any of the grounds stated, and there being no-other assignment of error, the judgment of the trial court is Affirmed.
Williams & Harper, for plaintiff in error. Zach. Childers, solicitor, contra.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.