Cunningham v. Strom
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Hill, C. J.
This case is here on a direct bill of exceptions in which the only valid assignment of error is that the finding of the court, without the intervention of a jury, is without any evidence to support it. No proper brief of the written and oral evidence is in the bill of exceptions or made a part of the record. What purports to be a brief is all the evidence in extenso, both material and immaterial, and also all the testimony which the court excluded from evidence; and as the only questions made depend upon a consideration of the evidence, the judgment of the lower court must be affirmed. Civil Code, §§ 5528, 5529; Albany Northern Ry. Co. v. Wheeler, 6 Ga. App. 270 ( 64 S. E. 1114 ); Huntley Mfg. Co. v. Nixon Grocery Co., 6 Ga. App. 46 ( 64 S. E. 79 ), and cases cited. • ' Judgment affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.