Dodd v. State
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Russell, J.
The discretion, of the trial judge, in dismissing the motion for a new trial for failure to file the brief of the evidence within the time provided by his order, was not abused. The decision is controlled by the ruling of this court in Guthrie v. Uendley, ante, 101 ( 68 S. E. 654 ).
Judgment affirmed.
Motion for new trial; from Cobb superior court — Judge Morris. January 10, 1910. Clay & Morris, fox plaintiff in error. J. P. Brooke, solicitor-general, contra.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.