Edge v. State
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Hill, C. J.
1. That the.panel of jurors heard the argument on the trial of one jointly indicted with the defendant is not a ground for challenge to the array; nor is it ground for peremptory challenge to the poll. The objection goes to the qualification of each juror, and is fully met by the questions and answers on the voir dire, where there is no other or fuller investigation before the judge as a trior.
2. No error of law appears, and the evidence fully supports the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Indictment for arson; from Cobb superior court — Judge Morris. June 1, 1910. Clay & Morris, for plaintiff in error. J. P. Brooke, solicitor-general, contra.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.