Ledbetter v. Savannah Brewing Co.
Ledbetter v. Savannah Brewing Company
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Hill, C. J.
1. This court can not review the action of the lower court in rejecting a tendered amendment, when it is not incorporated in a bill of exceptions or attached as an exhibit thereto, or otherwise made a part thereof. The rejected amendment is no part of the record, and' can not be so specified (unless incorporated in exceptions pendente lite) ; and the formality of having filed it with the clerk of the court before the order of court disallowing it does not make it a part of the record. Schaeffer v. Central Ry. Co., 6 Ga. App. 282 ( 64 S. E. 1107 ), and cases cited.
2. Where the allegations of a petition against the lessee of premises, brought to recover for damage caused by an excavation alleged to be on the leased premises, expressly negatived the creation of the same by the defendant, and did not show affirmatively or by fair inference that the defendant was connected in any manner with the excavation, either *283 in the use or in the maintenance thereof, the petition was properly dismissed on demurrer. Judgment affirmed.
Decided September 20, 1910. Action for damages; from city court of Savannah — Judge Freeman. January 22, 1910. Twiggs & Gazan, for plaintiff. Anderson & Cann, for defendant.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.