Connell v. State
Connell v. State, 72 S.E. 304 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911)
Summary
Indictment for adultery and fornication; from Haralson superior .court — Judge Edwards. May 10, 1911.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Powell, J.
1. In a prosecution against a man for fornication or adultery, testimony that the female with whom the intercourse is alleged to have taken place had intercourse with another man is immaterial, even though the female herself is a witness for the State.
2. A female witness can not be impeached by proof of specific acts of illicit intercourse. ' Judgment affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.