TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Coker v. City of Tifton

Coker v. City of Tifton, 72 S.E. 606 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Georgia · State Appellate Courts
Decided
November 7, 1911
Docket
No. 3641
Judges
Hill
Citations
72 S.E. 60610 Ga. App. 661911 Ga. App. LEXIS 648
Summary
Certiorari; from Tift superior court — Judge Thomas.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Hill

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Hill, C. J.

1. Questions involving the validity of a municipal ordinance and the jurisdiction of the trial court, not made in that court, and raised for the first time on certiorari in the superior court, will not be considered by the latter court, or by this court. Sutton v. Washington, 4 Ga. App. 30 ( 60 S. E. 811 ) ; S., F. & W. Ry. Co. v. Hardin, 110 Ga. 433 ( 35 S. E. 681 ).

2. No error of law appears, and the verdict fully supports the finding of the trial court. Judgment affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Savannah, Fla. & Western Ry. Co. v. Hardin, 35 S.E. 681 (Ga. 1900) 34
Sutton v. Mayor of Wash., 60 S.E. 811 (Ga. Ct. App. 1908) 9

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list