Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Whitaker
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Whitaker
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Hill, C. J.
The statutory presumption of negligence, raised by proof
that the plaintiff’s cow was killed by the running of the locomotive and cars of the defendant railroad company, was fully rebutted by the undisputed evidence; and, other than the presumption, there was no evidence whatever of negligence. The verdict against the company is therefore contrary to law, because without any evidence' to support it. Macon, Dublin & Savannah R. Co. v. Hamilton, 9 Ga. App. 254 ( 70 S. E. 1126 ); Southern R. Co. v. Harrell, 119 Ga. 521 ( 46 S. E. 637 ).
Judgment reversed.
Pópe & Bennet, R. G. Hartsfield, for plaintiff in error, cited: 9 Ga. App. 254 ; 7 Ga. App. 138 ; 3 Ga. App. 197 ; 119 Ga. 521 . G. G. Bower, contra, cited: 7 Ga. App. 566, 780 ; 6 Ga. App. 308 , 499.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 9 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.