Hammond v. Jacques
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Russell, J.
It not appearing to the satisfaction of the court that the opposite party .was served with notice of the depositions admitted in evidence, and it subsequently appearing, upon the hearing of the motion for a new trial, that the attorney who was notified did not in fact represent the defendant at the time that the notice of the taking of the depositions was given to him, it was not error to grant a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.