TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Cutts v. Watt-Harley-Holmes Co.

Cutts v. Watt-Harley-Holmes Co., 73 S.E. 592 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Georgia · State Appellate Courts
Decided
January 30, 1912
Docket
No. 3204
Judges
Russell
Citations
73 S.E. 59210 Ga. App. 4171912 Ga. App. LEXIS 543
Summary
Appeal; from Wilcox superior court — Judge Wbipple.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Russell

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Russell, J.

The evidence, though conflicting, supported the verdict rendered, and none of the assignments of error are of sufficient materiality to have required the grant of a new trial. This verdict being the second verdict in behalf of the plaintiff, and being approved by the trial judge, it will not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed. Pottle, J., not -presiding.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list