TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Satterfield v. Ayers

Satterfield v. Ayers & Cunningham

Satterfield v. Ayers, 73 S.E. 1091 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Georgia · State Appellate Courts
Decided
March 6, 1912
Docket
No. 3818
Judges
Hill
Citations
73 S.E. 109110 Ga. App. 7421912 Ga. App. LEXIS 667
Cited by 6
Summary
Action for breach of warranty; from city court of Hartwell.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Hill

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Hill, C. J.

1. Where an attorney, in the argument of a ease before the

jury, uses improper language which is claimed to be prejudicial, it is the duty of the attorney for the opposite party to invoke a ruling of the trial judge thereon, either by the declaration of a mistrial or by reprimanding the off ending attorney and giving proper instructions in reference to the language so used to the jury; and where no such action is invoked, the use of the improper language can not subsequently be made a ground of a motion for a new trial. Lavender v. State, 9 Ga. App. 856 ( 72 S. E. 437 ).

2. Except as above decided, no error of law is complained of; and the verdict is supported by the evidence. Judgment affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 6 cases

View all citing references →
1914: 11915: 11916: 11922: 11932: 11971: 119142026peak 1914 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Hart v. State179 S.E.2d 346 (Ga. 1971)
  2. Lenox Drug Co. v. New England Jewelry Co.85 S.E. 681 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915)
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. Ray113 S.E. 590 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922)
  4. Ware v. Lamar90 S.E. 364 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916)
  5. Hinsman v. State81 S.E. 367 (Ga. Ct. App. 1914)
  6. Shippen v. Thompson166 S.E. 41 (Ga. Ct. App. 1932)

Most recent

  1. Hart v. State179 S.E.2d 346 (Ga. 1971)
  2. Shippen v. Thompson166 S.E. 41 (Ga. Ct. App. 1932)
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. Ray113 S.E. 590 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922)
  4. Ware v. Lamar90 S.E. 364 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916)
  5. Lenox Drug Co. v. New England Jewelry Co.85 S.E. 681 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915)
  6. Hinsman v. State81 S.E. 367 (Ga. Ct. App. 1914)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Lavender v. State, 72 S.E. 437 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911) 2

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list