Home Mill & Grain Co. v. Southern Flour & Grain Co.
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Pottle, J.
The decision of the Supreme Court, referred to in the headnote, was rendered after the trial of the instant case. The-point presented was not free from difficulty, and if the trial judge had had that decision before him, his ruling would have been different. It results, however, from that decision, that the court erred in directing a verdict in favor of the defendant, and also erred in striking the plaintiffs amendment filed January 23, 1912, and in ruling out evidence as to market value.
Judgment reversed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.