TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Tice v. Crawford

Tice v. Crawford, 75 S.E. 268 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Georgia · State Appellate Courts
Decided
July 23, 1912
Docket
No. 4121
Judges
Hill
Citations
75 S.E. 26811 Ga. App. 3521912 Ga. App. LEXIS 398
Summary
Certiorari; from Richmond superior court — Judge H. C. Hammond. February 24, 1912.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Hill

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Hill, C. J.

The Supreme Court and this court have uniformly held that the discretion of the judge of the superior court in granting a first new trial on certiorari will not be interfered with, unless the judgment under review was demanded by the law and the evidence. Loftin v. Great Southern Some Benevolent Asso., 9 Ga. App. 121 ( 70 S. E. 353 ), and citations; 14 Encyc. Dig. Ga. Rep. 364. Judgment affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Loftin v. Great Southern Home Benevolent Ass'n, 70 S.E. 353 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911) 7

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list