Hagan Supply Co. v. Morris & Co.
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Hill, C. J.
The jury were authorized to find, from the evidence in this case, that a scheme was entered into between the vendor and the purchaser to evade the provisions of the Civil Code (1910), § 3226, regulating the sale of merchandise in bulk, by which the plaintiff, as a creditor of the vendor, was defrauded; and the verdict returned against the purchaser, on the traverse of his answer to the summons of garnishment served at the instance of the plaintiff, was fully supported by the evidence, and no error of law appears. Judgment affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.