Randall v. Daniel
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Hill, 0, J.
1. Where one employed as a cropper left without having made
the crop, and, his wife thereupon, with the knowledge and consent of the landlord, worked with her minor children and carried out the contract and made the crop, the landlord could not, after having accepted,, the wife’s services, refuse to settle with her, on the ground that his contract was made with her husband, and that, under the law, the husband was entitled to the services of his wife. Besides, there was evidence that the contract was originally made by the landlord with both husband and wife as croppers.
2. No error of law appears, and the evidence supports the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.