Hall v. Roehr & Co.
Hall v. Roehr & Company
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Russell, J.
“Where the only questions presented for review by this court arise upon rulings by'the court below on the trial of the issue raised by a special plea to the jurisdiction, which was not sustained by the verdict thereon returned, and it appears that neither a reversal of any one or more of such rulings nor a setting aside of §uch verdict would operate to terminate the main ease, but would leave the same still pending, the writ of error is premature and must be dismissed.” Ross v. Mercer, 115 Ga. 353 ( 41 S. E. 594 ). See also, State Mutual Association v. Kemp, 115 Ga. 355 ( 41 S. E. 652 ); Warren v. Blevins, 94 Ga. 215 ( 21 S. E. 459 ). Writ of error dismissed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.