Cheek v. State
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Roan, J.
1. There was no error in overruling the demurrer. If it was necessary to allege that the prosecutor sustained loss, this requirement was complied with by the allegation that he was “cheated and defrauded” in a named sum. The words “cheated and defrauded,” by necessary implication, assert loss.
2. The assignments of error as to the admission of certain testimony to which objection was made depend wholly upon the point raised by the demurrer, and are without merit.
3. The evidence authorized the verdict, and there was no error in refusing a new trial. Judgment affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.