TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

First National Bank v. Brooks & Co.

First Nat'l Bank v. Brooks & Co., 82 S.E. 608 (Ga. Ct. App. 1914)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Georgia · State Appellate Courts
Decided
August 22, 1914
Docket
No. 5638
Judges
Wade
Citations
82 S.E. 60815 Ga. App. 381914 Ga. App. LEXIS 9
Summary
Appeal; from Greene superior court—J. G. Faust, judge pro hac vice. February 17, 1914.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Wade

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Wade, J.

Tlie only issue in this ease, so far as appears from the record, was whether or not the indorsements and assignments entered on the three draf.ts sued upon were so entered bona fide and before maturity. While the evidence upon this point apparently preponderates in behalf of the plaintiff, still there is some evidence to authorize the finding which the jury returned in favor of the defendants, and since, in the state of the record, the errors complained of were immaterial, the discretion of the trial judge in refusing a new trial will not be interfered with.

Judgment affirmed.

Roan, J., absent.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list