TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Stansel v. Ford Motor Co.

Stansel v. Ford Motor Company

Stansel v. Ford Motor Co., 86 S.E. 412 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Georgia · State Appellate Courts
Decided
July 30, 1915
Docket
No. 5921
Judges
Russell
Citations
86 S.E. 41216 Ga. App. 7821915 Ga. App. LEXIS 226
Summary
Action on contract; from city court of Bainbridge — Judge Spooner. June 25, 1914.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Russell

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Russell, C. J.

There being no evidence that the plaintiff contracted with the defendant or with any person authorized as its agent to contract or to propose to contract with the plaintiff, nor any evidence that the defendant at any time ratified any negotiations on the part of any person purporting to act as its agent, a verdict in favor of the defendant was demanded by the evidence, and the merit of the various rulings upon the admissibility of testimony, to which exceptions were taken, is immaterial. Judgment affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list