Matthews & Son v. Richards
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Russell, C. J.
The trial judge having expressed an opinion not only as to what was testified by one of the witnesses, but also as to its meaning and effect, the grant of a new trial was demanded, under the provisions of section 4863 of the Civil Code. Other irregularities in the trial (some of which might have been avoided or cured by timely invoking from the court appropriate redress) are not likely to recur- upon another investigation, and therefore will not be discussed.
Judgment reversed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.