Partin v. Edwards
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Broyles, J.
1. This was an action to recover damages for b-each of a contract and, under the facts of the case, the court erred in excluding the testimony of the plaintiff as to the loss of profits.
2. The court erred in excluding the letter written by the defendant to the plaintiff, as it was admissible for the purpose of explaining an ambiguous statement in the written contract entered into by the parties.
3. It was error to exclude the evidence of the plaintiff that there were no logs on the mill yard when he stopped sawing.
4. The court erred in granting a nonsuit.
6. The assignments of error not referred to in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error are deemed abandoned. Judgment reversed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.