Olds-Oakland Co. v. Rountree
Olds-Oakland Company v. Rountree
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Wade, C. J.
1. The question involved in the trial of this case in the lower court was as to the nature and character of the contract of employment between the plaintiff and the defendant, under and by virtue of which the account sued upon accrued. The trial judge properly submitted the issues involved for determination by the jury, and there is no merit in the exceptions to various portions of his charge, of in the assignments of error based upon his refusal of several written requests to charge.
2. The evidence sufficiently supported the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 9 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.