TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Mark v. State

Mark v. State, 90 S.E. 493 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Georgia · State Appellate Courts
Decided
October 31, 1916
Docket
No. 7779
Judges
Wade
Citations
90 S.E. 49318 Ga. App. 7541916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1243
Summary
Accusation of misdemeanor; from city court of Savannah.— Judge Rourke. May 13, 1916.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Wade

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Wade, C. J.

The prosecution was based upon section 660, subdivision 6, of the Penal Code (1910), which declares that any person “who shall deposit or aid or abet another to deposit a ballot at any election in any name other than his own, as appears on the list of registered voters prescribed by law, . . shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.” The provisions of this section are not by its terms made applicable to primary elections, as is the case with regard to section 665 of the Penal Code, relating to “buying or selling votes, and voting illegally;” and the word *755 “election,” used in the said subdivision of section 660, does not itself include a primary election. See George v. State, ante, 753 ( 90 S. E. 493 ); People v. Foster, 60 Misc. 3 ( 112 N. Y. Supp. 706, 708 ); Hodge v. Bryan, 149 Ky. 110 ( 148 S. W. 21, 22 ); Dooley v. Jackson, 104 Mo. App. 21 ( 78 S. W. 330, 333 ). Criminal statutes must be construed strictly.

Decided October 31, 1916. Accusation of misdemeanor; from city court of Savannah.— Judge Rourke. May 13, 1916. Bouhan & Herzog, for plaintiff in error.- Walter O. Hartridge, solicitor-general, contra.

(a) The accusation charging the accused with the offense of a misdemeanor, for that he did on a day named in the county of Chatham, “in a certain .election, to wit, a Democratic primary election held in the city of Savannah, Georgia, for the purpose of nominating a candidate from the Democratic party to fill the unexpired term of Thomas P. Thomson, as tax-collector for Chatham county, deposit a ballot in a name other than his own, to wit, in the name of George W. Crosby, as said name appeared on the list of registered voters,” etc., did not set out any offense under the laws of the State of Georgia; and the trial judge therefore erred in overruling the demurrer and refusing to quash the accusation. Judgment reversed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1933: 119332026peak 1933 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Shea v. State169 S.E. 46 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933)

Most recent

  1. Shea v. State169 S.E. 46 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Hodge v. Bryan, 148 S.W. 21 (Ky. Ct. App. 1912) 22
Dooley v. Jackson, 78 S.W. 330 (Mo. Ct. App. 1904) 18
People v. Foster, 22 N.Y. Crim. 437 (1908) 10
George v. State, 90 S.E. 493 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916) 4

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list