Johnson v. State
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Luke, J.
The evidence as to the guilt of the accused was conflicting, but the jury trying the case were properly instructed by the court, and returned a verdict of guilty. The newly discovered evidence was cumulative in its character, and, the trial judge having approved the verdict, and there being some evidence to authorize the conviction, this court will not disturb the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Wade, O. J., and George, J., eonour.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.