Fowler-Flemister Coal Co. v. Evans
Fowler-Flemister Coal Company v. Evans
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Luke, J.
1. The court did not err in refusing to permit the defendant’s witness to answer the following question: “That cupping or pulling apart was not the result of any negligence on your part;” the court stating that the witness could testify to the facts, but could not testify to his conclusion that his conduct was or was not negligent.
2. When the charge of the court is considered as a whole, the instructions complained of are not subject, to the criticisms urged in the motion for a new trial. The charge was full and fair.
3. The evidence authorized the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge.
Judgment affirmed.
Wade, G. J., and George, J., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.