TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Cole v. Jordan

Cole v. Jordan, 93 S.E. 33 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Georgia · State Appellate Courts
Decided
June 18, 1917
Docket
No. 8132
Judges
Luke
Citations
93 S.E. 3320 Ga. App. 3021917 Ga. App. LEXIS 874
Headnotes
The court did not err in sustaining the motion to strike the caveat to the petition for appointment as administrator with the will annexed, it not being alleged in the caveat that the petitioner was not next of kin nor beneficially interested in the estate.
Summary
Petition for letters of administration—appeal; from Haralson superior court—Judge Bartlett. May 23, 1916.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Luke

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Luke, J.

Grover Jordan filed with the ordinary of Haralson county a petition for letters of administration with will annexed upon the estate of J. M. Jordan, alleging that the said J. M. Jordan died testate, and that the petitioner is next of kin to the deceased, etc. A. B. Cole and M. J. Head filed a caveat on the following grounds: (1) -That “objectors own five shares of the estate, and are entitled to one half of said estate, there being only ten shares, and that the applicant, Grover Jordan, owns only one share thereof. (2) That said Jordan is not otherwise qualified; that he has been in possession of the estate for several years, and *303 is debtor to said estate, in a large amount for rent. (3) That, being the owner of the said five shares, they are entitled to the administration on said estate.”

The court sustained a motion to strike the caveat, on the ground that it was not sufficient, and the caveators excepted. The court did not err in striking the caveat because of its legal insufficiency.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, G. J., and George, J., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1938: 11950: 11952: 119382026peak 1938 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Roe v. Pitts62 S.E.2d 387 (Ga. Ct. App. 1950)
  2. Cubine v. Cubine199 S.E. 833 (Ga. Ct. App. 1938)
  3. Ennis v. Carson71 S.E.2d 881 (Ga. Ct. App. 1952)

Most recent

  1. Ennis v. Carson71 S.E.2d 881 (Ga. Ct. App. 1952)
  2. Roe v. Pitts62 S.E.2d 387 (Ga. Ct. App. 1950)
  3. Cubine v. Cubine199 S.E. 833 (Ga. Ct. App. 1938)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list