Georgia Railroad v. Jolles
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
George, J.
1. The evidence authorized the verdict, and there is no merit in the general grounds of the motion for a new trial.
2. The amendment to the motion for a new trial complains of error in the court’s charge. Some of the excerpts quoted from the charge, and specially assigned as error, are not entirely accurate; but, the whole charge considered, the ease was fairly tried. None of the alleged errors require a reversal of the judgment.
Judgment affirmed.
Wade, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.