Barber v. City of Rome
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Luke, J.
Where, upon the trial of an action for damages against a city, for physical injuries alleged to have been caused by a nail in a plank which the city had placed in the street for pedestrians to walk on, it did not appear, from the evidence, that the city had in fact placed the plank as alleged, or how long it had been so placed, the court did not err in granting a nonsuit.
Judgment affirmed.
Wade, O. J., and George, J., concur.
Action for damages; from Floyd superior court—Judge Wright. January 12, 1917. Eubanks & Mebane, for plaintiff. Max Meyerhardt, for defendant.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.