Haggerty v. Holmes & Barber
Haggerty v. Holmes & Barber, 93 S.E. 559 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917)
Summary
Action for damages; from city court of Yaldosta—Judge Cranford. March 20, 1917.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
G-eobge, J.
An examination of the record discloses no substantial error upon any controlling issue in the case. This being the second verdict in favor of the defendant, and there being evidence to sustain the verdict, the judgment overruling the plaintiff’s motion for new trial will not be reversed.
Judgment affirmed.
Wade, C. J., and Luhe, J., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.