Whidby v. State
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Bloodworth, J.
1. “A motion for a mistrial was not the appropriate remedy when, upon a x>oll of the jury, the party against whom the verdict was rendered contended that it appeared from the answers of one of the jurors that it was not his verdict.” Macon Railway &c. Co. v. Barnes, 121 Ca. 444 ( 49 S. E. 282 ).
2. The court did not err in refusing to sanction the certiorari.
Judgment affirmed.
Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.