Barrett v. Western & Atlantic Railroad
Barrett v. Western and Atlantic Railroad Company
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Wade, C. J.
1. In the absence of timely written requests therefor, there is no merit in those grounds of the motion for a new trial which complain of the failure of the court to give certain specific instructions. The charge was sufficiently full, and clearly submitted the issues to the jury.
2. There is no such substantial merit in any of the remaining special grounds óf the motion for a new trial as to require a reversal.
3. The evidence sufficiently sustains the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Jenkins and Luke,.JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.