Bank of Omega v. Findley
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Jenkins, J.
The court in its charge fully and fairly submitted to the jury the question of whether, under the evidence, the cashier of the plaintiff bank, was acting as the agent of the plaintiff or as agent of the defendant, in collecting and applying the alleged payments; the jury found in favor of the defendant on that issue, and that the cashier in so acting was the agent of the plaintiff bank; the evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Wade, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.