TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

King v. State

King v. State, 97 S.E. 81 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Georgia · State Appellate Courts
Decided
October 14, 1918
Docket
No. 9775
Judges
Bloodworth
Citations
97 S.E. 8122 Ga. App. 6421918 Ga. App. LEXIS 655
Summary
Indictment for possessing intoxicating liquor; from Whitfield superior court—Judge Tarver. April 10, 1918.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Bloodworth

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Bloodworth, J.

The grounds of the’amended motion for a new trial'are without merit, the evidence demanded the verdict, and the motion for new trial was properly overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list