Hemphill v. Cohutta Banking Co.
Hemphill v. Cohutta Banking Company
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Wade, C. J.
The pleadings and the rulings of the lower court thereon ■ in this case being substantially the same as those in Leonard v. Cohutta Banking Co., 21 Ga. App. 777 ( 95 S. E. 113 ), the decision there made, that “the court did not err in its rulings on the' pleadings, nor in directing a verdict for the plaintiff,” is controlling, and the judgment of the trial judge is Affirmed.
Jenkins and Luke, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.