Reynolds v. State
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Broyles, C. J.
1. The alleged newly discovered evidence is merely cumulative and impeaching in its character, and, therefore, under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court, affords no ground for a new trial.
2. There was some evidence which authorized the defendant’s conviction of manslaughter, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without jurisdiction to interfere.
Judgment affirmed.
Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.