Lummus Cotton Gin Co. v. Baugh
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Stephens, J.
1. A clause in a contract of employment which provides for a definite term of employment, to continue on condition that the conduct and services of the employee are satisfactory to the employer, but which gives the employer the right “ to be the sole judge in reserving the right to terminate this contract upon thirty days’ notice at any time,” does not authorize the employer to terminate the contract and dispense with the services of the employee solely upon the ground that the employer’s financial interests make such action by the employer necessary. The employer’s right to be the sole judge as to the conditions upon which he will terminate the contract must, if any effect is given to the provision that the employee’s right to continue in service for the period contracted for is conditioned upon the employee’s services being satisfactory to the employer, be exercised only as respects the character of service upon the part of the employee, of which character of service the employer is to be the sole judge.
2. Applying the above rulings, the court did not, in a suit by the employee against the employer for an alleged illegal discharge of the -plaintiff by the defendant under the contract, err in overruling the demurrers interposed by the defendant.
Judgment affirmed.
Jenkins, P. J., and Bell, J., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.