Barksdale v. State
Barksdale v. State, 122 S.E. 96 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Broyles, C. J.
The accused was convicted of manufacturing whisky, and his motion for a new trial was based upon the usual general grounds only. There was some evidence authorizing the verdict, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.
Judgment affirmed.
Luke and Bloochoorth, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.