TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Boswell v. Ivie

Boswell v. Ivie, 122 S.E. 97 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Georgia · State Appellate Courts
Decided
March 13, 1924
Docket
No. 15104
Judges
Bell
Citations
122 S.E. 9731 Ga. App. 8071924 Ga. App. LEXIS 205
Summary
Trover; from city court of Greensboro—Judge Fisher. September 14, 1923.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Bell

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Bell, J.

The grantor in a security deed to land, while remaining in the peaceable possession thereof, has such interest and right of possession in the lumber sawn from the timber thereon as will defeat an action of trover for the lumber by the grantee in the security deed. So also as to the right and interest of one who has purchased the timber, or the lumber, from him. Colquitt County Land Co. v. Rowell, 30 Ga. App. 738 (1) ( 119 S. E. 223 ). This rule is not altered by the fact that the debt secured by the deed was past due when the timber was cut. Broxton v. Ennis, 96 Ga. 792 (1) ( 22 S. E. 945 ) “To recover in trover it is essential that the plaintiff show either title or right of possession: in some cases he must show both. In the latter class of cases, although the plaintiff may show that he has legal title, if it appears that he has by contract surrendered possession to another, who is rightfully entitled to retain possession, he cannot recover possession by mere proof of title.” Birmingham Fertilizer Co. v. Dozier, 13 Ga. App. 759, 762 ( 79 S. E. 927 ). Accordingly, the court did not err in awarding a nonsuit. This does not mean that the plaintiff was remediless, but that under the facts trover would not lie.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., eoneur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 11 cases

View all citing references →
1925: 11926: 11928: 11931: 11934: 11938: 31952: 11957: 11968: 119252026peak 1938 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Federal Land Bank v. Saint Clair Lumber Co.199 S.E. 337 (Ga. Ct. App. 1938)
  2. Mills Lumber Co. v. Milam194 S.E. 911 (Ga. Ct. App. 1938)
  3. Darby v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance141 S.E. 410 (Ga. 1928) · Dissent
  4. Underwood v. Underwood159 S.E. 725 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931)
  5. Groover v. Savannah Bank & Trust Co.198 S.E. 217 (Ga. 1938)
  6. Livingston v. Epsten-Roberts Co.177 S.E. 79 (Ga. Ct. App. 1934)

Most recent

  1. Morris v. Townsend164 S.E.2d 869 (Ga. Ct. App. 1968)
  2. Farmer v. Whitehead98 S.E.2d 145 (Ga. Ct. App. 1957)
  3. Raines v. Graham70 S.E.2d 125 (Ga. Ct. App. 1952)
  4. Federal Land Bank v. Saint Clair Lumber Co.199 S.E. 337 (Ga. Ct. App. 1938)
  5. Groover v. Savannah Bank & Trust Co.198 S.E. 217 (Ga. 1938)
  6. Mills Lumber Co. v. Milam194 S.E. 911 (Ga. Ct. App. 1938)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Birmingham Fertilizer Co. v. Dozier, 79 S.E. 927 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913) 12
Colquitt Cnty. Land Co. v. Rowell, 119 S.E. 223 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923) 10
Broxton v. Ennis, 22 S.E. 945 (Ga. 1895) 7

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list