TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Integrity Mutual Casualty Co. v. Jones

Integrity Mut. Cas. Co. v. Jones, 126 S.E. 876 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Georgia · State Appellate Courts
Decided
February 14, 1925
Docket
No. 15705
Judges
Stephens
Citations
126 S.E. 87633 Ga. App. 4891925 Ga. App. LEXIS 543

Opinion of the Court — Stephens

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Stephens, J.

1. A laborer who is employed to assist in hauling logs upon an automobile from a swamp to his employer’s sawmill located elsewhere, and who is permitted by his employer to ride upon the truck when going to the mill from the swaihp for the purpose of bringing back logs, is in the discharge of his duties when so riding upon the truck; and where injured by falling from the truck, his injury arises out of and in the course of' his employment.

2. Although at the time of the injury such employee was riding at a dangerous place on the fender of the truck, where he had voluntarily placed himself after having been warned of the danger and although the employer had issued a rule to the effect that the employees riding *490 upon the truck should not ride in such position, yet where it does not appear that such rule had been approved by the industrial commission, the employee is not barred from a recovery of compensation by reason of any breach by him of the rule, since such bar applies only where the rule has the approval of the commission. Ga. L. 1920, p. 167, sec. 14.

Decided February 14, 1925. Harry L. Greene, McDaniel & Neely, for plaintiffs in error. B. Earl Gamy, contra.

3. Where such employee, while riding' in such a position on the fender of the truck, was thrown off by the swerving of the truck, caused by the action of the driver, and was killed, although the employee had been ordered by the driver, with authority from the employer, not to ride there, the inference is authorized that his death was caused by negligence of himself or of his employer, and not by wilful misconduct on his part.

4. In an application by the wife of the laborer to recover compensation for his death the industrial commission was authorized to make an award of compensation.

Jtidgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Bell, J., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1930: 11939: 11945: 11993: 119302026peak 1930 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Scoggins33 S.E.2d 534 (Ga. Ct. App. 1945)
  2. Sprayberry v. Independence Indemnity Co.152 S.E. 125 (Ga. Ct. App. 1930)
  3. Wilbro v. Mossman427 S.E.2d 857 (Ga. Ct. App. 1993)
  4. Pullman Company v. Carter6 S.E.2d 351 (Ga. Ct. App. 1939)

Most recent

  1. Wilbro v. Mossman427 S.E.2d 857 (Ga. Ct. App. 1993)
  2. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Scoggins33 S.E.2d 534 (Ga. Ct. App. 1945)
  3. Pullman Company v. Carter6 S.E.2d 351 (Ga. Ct. App. 1939)
  4. Sprayberry v. Independence Indemnity Co.152 S.E. 125 (Ga. Ct. App. 1930)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list