TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Robertson v. State

Robertson v. State, 133 S.E. 284 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Georgia · State Appellate Courts
Decided
May 12, 1926
Docket
No. 17257
Judges
Bloodwobth
Citations
133 S.E. 28435 Ga. App. 3951926 Ga. App. LEXIS 388

Opinion of the Court — Bloodwobth

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Bloodwobth, J.

The evidence of the accomplice as to the guilt of the accused was direct and positive, and while the evidence of the accomplice must be corroborated, the extent of the corroboration is entirely for the jury. There being some corroborating testimony, this court will not say that the evidence did not authorize the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1930: 119302026peak 1930 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Walters v. State153 S.E. 925 (Ga. Ct. App. 1930)

Most recent

  1. Walters v. State153 S.E. 925 (Ga. Ct. App. 1930)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list