TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Seminole Securities Co. v. State

Seminole Securities Company v. State of Georgia

Seminole Sec. Co. v. State, 134 S.E. 625 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Georgia · State Appellate Courts
Decided
September 17, 1926
Docket
No. 17172
Judges
Jenkins
Citations
134 S.E. 62535 Ga. App. 7231926 Ga. App. LEXIS 1093

Opinion of the Court — Jenkins

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Jenkins, P. J.

1. In a proceeding under section 20 of the act of March 28, 1917 (Park’s Code Supp. 1922, § 448(oooo)), to condemn a vehicle or conveyance used in transporting liquor, the sale or possession of which is prohibited by law, the burden is upon the State, the condemner, to show that the vehicle or conveyance was used in conveying the prohibited liquors or beverages with the knowledge of the owner or lessee. Lang v. Hitt, 149 Ga. 667 ( 101 S. E. 795 ) ; Citizens Trust Co. v. State, 26 Ga. App. 750 ( 107 S. E. 274 ). Accordingly, where, as in the instant case, it appears from the evidence that title to the automobile sought to be condemned was not in the person in whose possession it was at the time of its illegal use, but was in the intervener under a conditional bill of sale reserving title in the vendor thereof, and transferred to the intervener, and there being no evidence attacking the validity of the instrument, and none in anywise indicating that such owner of the automobile had any knowledge that it was being used in conveying the prohibited liquors, the judgment of condemnation was without evidence to support it. Armington v. State, 24 Ga. App. 75 ( 100 S. E. 15 ).

2. The transfer of the conditional bill of sale from the original vendor to the intervener, while not showing on its face the authority of the agent executing it for the vendor to do so, was admitted in evidence apparently without objection, and can not now be attacked for that reason as insufficient to show title in the intervener as holder. Sheffield v. Johnson County Bank, 2 Ga. App. 221 ( 58 S. E. 386 ) ; Edwards v. Camp, 29 Ga. App. 556 ( 116 S. E. 210 ), and eases there1 cited.

Judgment reversed.

Stephens and Bell, JJ., coneur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1927: 11944: 11947: 119272026peak 1927 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State v. Industrial Acceptance Corp.139 S.E. 577 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927)
  2. Consolidated Loan Co. v. State41 S.E.2d 802 (Ga. Ct. App. 1947)
  3. Bentley v. State of Georgia28 S.E.2d 658 (Ga. Ct. App. 1944)

Most recent

  1. Consolidated Loan Co. v. State41 S.E.2d 802 (Ga. Ct. App. 1947)
  2. Bentley v. State of Georgia28 S.E.2d 658 (Ga. Ct. App. 1944)
  3. State v. Industrial Acceptance Corp.139 S.E. 577 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 5

DepthCaseCited by
Sheffield v. Johnson Cnty. Sav. Bank, 58 S.E. 386 (Ga. Ct. App. 1907) 25
Lang v. Hitt, 101 S.E. 795 (Ga. 1920) 9
Edwards v. Camp, 116 S.E. 210 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923) 8
Armington & Sons v. State, 100 S.E. 15 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917) 6
Citizens Trust Co. v. State, 107 S.E. 274 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921) 4

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list