Martin v. State
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Bloodwoktii, J.
Under the answer of the judge of the criminal court of Atlanta to the writ of certiorari, which is neither excepted to nor traversed, and must be accepted as conclusive, the certiorari was properly overruled.
Judgment affirmed.
Broyles, G. J., and Lu,ke, J., eoneur.
Eldon Haldane, for plaintiff in error. John 8. McClelland, solicitor, John A. Boylcin, solicitor-general, J. W. LeCraw, contra.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 6 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.