TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Southern Surety Co. v. Elliott

SOUTHERN SURETY COMPANY OF NEW YORK v. ELLIOTT

Southern Sur. Co. v. Elliott, 161 S.E. 679 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Georgia · State Appellate Courts
Decided
December 15, 1931
Docket
No. 21874
Judges
Luke
Citations
161 S.E. 67944 Ga. App. 3761931 Ga. App. LEXIS 733

Opinion of the Court — Luke

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Luke, J.

In a proceeding pending before the Industrial Commission of Georgia, instituted by H. M. Elliott against Sims & Clonts, employers, and Southern Surety Company of New York, insurer, an order was taken by the full commission on June 20, 1931, as follows: “ . . This case came before the full commission on June 22, 1931, upon application of the employee for a review of the award of Commissioner Stanley made on May 28, 1931. The employee also petitioned for the introduction of further evidence which is essential to the proper adjudication of the claim,'and this petition is granted. This case will be remanded to a single commissioner for further hearing, and the parties at interest notified when the case is set for hearing.” The Industrial Commission allowed an application for appeal to the superior court from this order. That court affirmed the order appealed from; and to this judgment the employers and the insurer excepted.

After due consideration, this court is clearly of the opinion that the order of the commission involved here is not in the nature of such a final "award,” "order,” “judgment,” or "decision” as is contemplated by section 59 of the workmen’s compensation act, providing for appeals to the superior courts from decisions of the Industrial Commission. Since, in our view, the appeal to the superior court was *377 improvideutly allowed by the Industrial Commission, no harmful error was committed by the superior court in the premises.

Let the writ of error be dismissed with costs.

Writ of error dismissed.

Broyles, O. J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1936: 11955: 11963: 11975: 11982: 119362026peak 1936 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Garner v. Owens-Illinois Glass Container216 S.E.2d 709 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975)
  2. Chastain v. SPARTAN MILLS88 S.E.2d 836 (S.C. 1955)
  3. King v. Western Union Telegraph Co.187 S.E. 888 (Ga. Ct. App. 1936)
  4. Ocean Accident & Guaranty Co. v. Hulsey131 S.E.2d 806 (Ga. Ct. App. 1963)
  5. Farist v. Blue Ridge Carpet Mills291 S.E.2d 741 (Ga. Ct. App. 1982)

Most recent

  1. Farist v. Blue Ridge Carpet Mills291 S.E.2d 741 (Ga. Ct. App. 1982)
  2. Garner v. Owens-Illinois Glass Container216 S.E.2d 709 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975)
  3. Ocean Accident & Guaranty Co. v. Hulsey131 S.E.2d 806 (Ga. Ct. App. 1963)
  4. Chastain v. SPARTAN MILLS88 S.E.2d 836 (S.C. 1955)
  5. King v. Western Union Telegraph Co.187 S.E. 888 (Ga. Ct. App. 1936)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list