Askew v. Sparks
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Broyles, O. J.
1. Under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court, an objection to the admission of evidence raises no question for the consideration of the reviewing court where a part of the evidence objected to is admissible and the objection covers all of the evidence. This ruling disposes of special ground (a) of the motion for a new trial.
2. Special ground (6) of the motion for a new trial complains of the admission of certain testimony over the movant’s objection, in substance, that it was not authorized by the evidence. The ground, however, fails to set forth any of the evidence, and therefore is not complete and understandable within itself, and can not be considered.
3. The remaining special grounds of the motion (complaining of alleged errors of commission and omission in the charge of the court), when considered in the light of the charge as a whole and the facts of the case, show no cause for reversal of the judgment.
4. The evidence authorized the verdict in favor of the defendants, and the refusal to grant a new trial was. not error for any reason assigned.
Judgment affirmed.
I/uhe, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.