Kennedy v. State
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Hooper, J.
1. The court did not err, under the facts of this ease, in charging the jury in substance that if the defendant did the acts charged in the accusation, he would be guilty, though he did not intend to commit any crime.
2. The verdict of guilty returned by the jury upon two counts of the accusation was amply supported by the evidence, no error of law appears, and the trial judge did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Broyles, O. J., concurs. MacIntyre, J., not presiding.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.